You are here:  Home  >  Columnists  >  Current Article

The New World Order: America To Lose Superpower Rank Soon

By   /  February 17, 2010  /  3 Comments

    Print       Email

The world’s only reigning super-power is set to lose its position to four emerging super powers namely: Japan, China, European Union (under command of Germany) and the Arab Magreb Union (if they stick together). This is set to conclude in three year’s time. The Obama win has only delayed the American demotion, as Obama’s presidency is a public relations mini-era which will hardly change the impending thrust of the new international power order. African countries and other developing states should re-examine their foreign policies and alliances in favour of this emerging powers.

The New World Order is a phrase created by former U.S President George Bush during the Gulf War. At this time the U.S administration viewed America as the dominant power in the world since the fall of the Roman Empire.

According to Kenneth Waltz; a great Lord Professor of Political Science at the University of California, there is an emerging new world order in the international political system. To him, for more than 300 years the drama of the modern history has turned on the rise and fall of great powers. He employs the concept of polarity, which is a structure of international system that is based on the number of great powers and their interrelationships. Unipolarity denotes existence of one super power; Bipolarity; two super powers and Multipolarity, several great powers.

There were twelve great powers in the multipolar era; of this seven remained at the beginning of World War II. At the end of the war two powers emerged, America and Soviet Union: bipolarity therefore prevailed. The Soviet Union as well as the U.S intervened widely in affairs of other states. For instance, the U.S intervened militarily to defend allies in China, Korea and Vietnam while the Soviet Union on the other hand acted in Afghanistan, Angola and Ethiopia. The two powers developed ideologies: interventionist liberalism\capitalism for U.S and communism for Soviet Union.

A combination of factors such as economic burdens of allies and internal upheavals, precipitated the fall of the Soviet Union internationally. This led to the current unipolar system where the U.S as a sole super power has for long not been checked by another state or combination of countries. But balance of power is a recurring phenomenon. Other countries alone or in concert will eventually bring American power into balance. The E.U (European Union), China or Japan qualify to play this role of great powers to check the U.S.

A reluctant super power, Japan’s institutions and behaviour support the proposition that it has again taken its position among great powers. Its productivity and technology have worldwide influence. In fact the E.U strove to achieve economic unity in 1972 partly due to fear that a disunited Europe could not stand up to a Japanese and American competition. According to renown  International Relations scholar Charles Kegley; latest national economic growth rates point to a world in which China is likely to overtake U.S and the larger E.U. U.S, just like Britain at the end of World War II; is exhausted by the myriad interventionist policies in Iraq, Somali, Palestine, Afghanistan and Iran to name a few.

We are on the brow of a century where rank of a power no longer depends on military strength only, but a combination of items like size of population and territory, political stability and competence, and magnitude of the economy. Power status cannot be maintained without certain economic capability. Today to estimate the power of countries, analysts frequently rely on the economic size because this measure predicts the power potential of each state. Though the U.S, China, Japan, India and Germany are today’s economic powerhouses; by 2014 global hierarchy of power will change. Economically China will lead then U.S, Japan, India, Indonesia, Germany, South Korea, Thailand, France, Taiwan, Brazil, Italy, Russia, Britain and Mexico.

It is therefore clear that as military worries fall, economic worries rise; hence competition and conflict continue to turn on technological and economic issues. The outcome is a set of great powers forming their own regional bases to stem economic competition. Japan or China will lead East Asia bloc, EU in Western Europe, U.S at centre of North America Free Trade Area (NAFTA), while Germany will play a leading role in Eastern Europe.

Finally, with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, U.S ascended to super power status, with hegemonic leadership. However, as the former U.S Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, observed, “Overwhelming power evokes nearly automatically a quest by other countries to achieve a greater voice and to reduce the relative position of the strongest.” In the long run the current unipolarity under U.S is very unlikely to endure. The historical cycle has come to fulfillment; just like the previous formidable sole powers- Roman Empire and Britain – which are now ordinary states; the U.S is headed for a fall. Africa, especially Kenya which has an amorphous foreign policy, must immediately adjust its international relations policy away from sinking U.S.


    Print       Email

About the author


Wilfred Mulliro is Kenyan columnist. MA in International Studies from University of Nairobi, B.Ed. in English Literature from Kenyata University. His articles which focus on Social issues and Politics appear in Kenya's leading Newspapers.


  1. avatar Juma says:

    It’s granted that Africa needs a serious realignment with this phenomenon, (world oeder) a terminology that has got its place in international discourse. the peoblem for Africa come sgreatly in its history of alliance and allegiance with her former colonial masters. That is why Robert Mugabe may come up to make sense at some point in the development.

  2. avatar Augustine says:

    the US has concentrated mainly on African superpowers like south Africa, Nigeria, Egypt and Kenya as their backbone to try and take control of Africa.but time has come when African countries need to unite and stop depending on international aids in return of favors which in the long run tend to enslave them the most…..this is because these G8 countries are struggling for supremacy and the only way they may achieve this is by directly or indirectly controlling other countries

  3. avatar Anwar abdi fatah says:

    Well, no doubt that american unipolary power will collapse at the end of the day because u.s government is fighting several countries in the world , so at the first it will lose their economis gradualy and that will lead to lose politicaly

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also like...

Members of Somalia’s Leadership Forum Disagree on their Official Communiqué

Read More →